History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harlib v. Harlib
1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11086
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1962
|
Check Treatment

*884Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally and Bergan, JJ.; Eager and Steuer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the defendant did not receive a fair trial, in that there were errors in the charge and in the exclusion of testimony and for the additional reason that there was undue participation by the court in the examination of witnesses.

Case Details

Case Name: Harlib v. Harlib
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 6, 1962
Citation: 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11086
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.