midpage

Hargrove v. StateHargrove v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 16, 1992
No. 91-02041
Versions:609 So. 2d 177
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12588
1992 WL 372251
PER CURIAM.

We affirm Belton Hargrove’s judgment and sentence. We remand for correction of the written judgment.

As to count one of the information, the trial court orally adjudicated Hargrove guilty of possession of methamphetamine, a third-degree felony, which was consistent with the jury verdict. However, the written judgment reflects that Hargrove was adjudicated guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to sell, a second-degree felony. Although the parties did not raise this issue, we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Maynard v. State, 525 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hargrove v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 16, 1992
Citations: 609 So. 2d 177; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12588; 1992 WL 372251; No. 91-02041
Docket Number: No. 91-02041
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In