History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hardy v. Mobbs
131 Vt. 148
Vt.
1973
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This action was dismissed under the authority of Rule 25(a)(1) of V.R.C.P.

Since no application for relief from the application of the above rule was made under V.R.C.P. 6(b), the dismissal was proper. See 7A C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil Rule 25(a) (1972).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hardy v. Mobbs
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Feb 15, 1973
Citation: 131 Vt. 148
Docket Number: No. 69-72; 70-72
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.