History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co.
322 N.C. 106
N.C.
1988
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The portion of the Court of Appeals opinion which vacates in part the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission is before us by virtue of the dissenting opinion of Phillips, J. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion is reversed.

We conclude that defendants’ petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed. The result is that the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission remains in full force and effect.

*107In plaintiffs’ appeal, reversed.

In defendants’ appeal, discretionary review improvidently allowed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Apr 6, 1988
Citation: 322 N.C. 106
Docket Number: No. 650A87
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.