History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hardman v. State
73 S.E. 343
Ga.
1911
Check Treatment
Eish, 0. 3.

Counsel for tlie plaintiff in error says in Iris brief filed in this court that the only point insisted on for a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is that the verdict is without evidence to support it. After a careful study of the evidence, we are of the opinion that it was sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hardman v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 12, 1911
Citation: 73 S.E. 343
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.