40 Barb. 435 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1863
Lead Opinion
The defendants took their mortgage expressly subject to the prior mortgage. It may be admitted
Hardin v. Hyde.
Mullin, J. and Bacon, J. concurred.
Dissenting Opinion
No exception was taken by the defendants to the ruling in respect to the debts due the banking association, and that as to these debts, the plaintiff’s
Judgment affirmed.
Mullin, Bacon and Allen, Justices.]
Ante, p. 359.