There can be no question but plaintiff, under this provision, could have compelled the assignment of the mortgage to him, by paying to Mrs. Colvin, or to any person authorized to receive it for her, the amount of the mortgage, with the interest thereon and the costs of the action. But the question is whether Creighton had authority, by virtue of his relation
Harbach v. Colvin
73 Iowa 638
| Iowa | 1887AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.