History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hanson v. State
839 So. 2d 859
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2003
Check Treatment
STRINGER, Judge.

Oscar Hanson challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

In his motion, Hanson alleged that his pleas were involuntary because trial counsel affirmatively misadvised him that the convictions could not be used in the future as prior offenses for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hanson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 12, 2003
Citation: 839 So. 2d 859
Docket Number: No. 2D02-3665
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.