197 N.W. 679 | S.D. | 1924
This action was 'brought by owners of the southeast quarter of section 35, Le Roy township, Lake county, to prevent the joint boards of Le Roy and Lake View Townships from entering- upon-and appropriating a. strip of land for the purpose of opening and grading a highway across said quarter section. Lake View township joins Le Roy township on the south. The owners of the southwest quarter of said section were made parties to the action after the commencement thereof. Findings and judgment were for the plaintiffs. The defendant townships and their boards appeal from' the judgment and from an order denying new trial.
The section line on the south side of said section 35 between Le Roy and Lake View townships runs through a large lake or slough, and it was and is impracticable to use it as a highway. Rev. Pol. Code 1903, § 1594. OneTorkel Llanson was the original entryman of the southeast quarter of said section. The present owners are his heirs. One A. H. Hegdahl was the original entryman of the
“All members present. On motion the report of L<■ T. Crow, C. E. Hanneman and M. E. Hart, as to damages assessed on account of highway crossing the southwest quarter of section 35, township 107, range 52, was accepted and the assessed damages of $50.00 was also, on motion, ordered to be set aside by the county treasurer to pay said damages, as provided by law, and said highway, as petitioned for by Torkel Hanson and others, was ordered open, 66 feet in width.”
The county board caused to' be surveyed and marked off a highway 66 feet wide across the south half of said section about 1,000 feet north of the south line. The county board built the requested bridge for Hanson. Hegdahl did not accept the award at that time, but the record of the October, 1893, meeting of the board shows that he was then paid the amount of the award with interest. This road was recognized by Hanson and Hegdahl during their lifetimes, and is not now contested by the-Hegdahl heirs, and was not contested by the Hanson heirs until the autumn of 1920. It was continuously used as a public highway substantiallv along -the line laid out and marked. Some work was done on it by the officials. We are of the opinion that the clear preponderance of the evidence showed the existence of a highway across the southwest quarter of said section, and a dedication by Hanson and acceptance by the county board of a highway across the south
The judgment and order denying new trial are vacated, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in harmony with this opinion.
Note. — Reported in 197 N. W. 679. See, Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Dedication, Key-No. 44, 20 C. J. Sec. 138; Highways, Key-No. 17, 20 C. J. Secs. 138, 90.