History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hans H. Wehrli v. James Pagliotti City of Los Angeles, Hugh R. Manes, Esq., Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant
947 F.2d 1424
9th Cir.
1991
Check Treatment

Upon reconsideration, a thorough examination of the record has disclosed an abundance of material that was not included in appellant’s brief. Unfortunately, appellees filed no opposition brief nor any other papers before this court to assist us in deciding this matter.

After reviewing the record, particularly the transcripts, we conclude that the district judge exercised commendable restraint in dealing with counsel for both parties. The record establishes that counsel failed to provide the court with the assistance on jury instructions and special verdict forms that judges would normally expect from counsel.

We also conclude that the district court’s factual findings regarding the sanctions imposed were not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the opinion filed August 1, 1991 is vacated and ordered withdrawn from publication. The district court’s judgment imposing sanctions is

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Hans H. Wehrli v. James Pagliotti City of Los Angeles, Hugh R. Manes, Esq., Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 5, 1991
Citation: 947 F.2d 1424
Docket Number: 88-5831
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In