History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hanrahan v. Mennon
9:07-cv-00610
N.D.N.Y.
Mar 31, 2011
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

______________________________________________

TIMOTHY HANRAHAN, JR.,

Plaintiff, v. 9:07-CV-610 (FJS/ATB) DR. MENON, Herkimer County Mental

Health; EDGAR SCUDDER, Director of

Community Services, Herkimer County Mental

Health; HERKIMER COUNTY

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; CAPTAIN

MCGRAIL, Superintendent, Herkimer County

Correctional Facility; SHANNON URTZ, RN,

Medical Department, Herkimer County

Correctional Facility; and HON. CHRISTOPHER

FARBER, Policymaker for Herkimer County

Correctional Facility,

Defendants.

______________________________________________

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL TIMOTHY W. HANRAHAN, JR.

Ilion, New York 13357

Plaintiff pro se

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C. KEVIN E. HULSLANDER, ESQ. 250 South Clinton Street MICHELLE M. DAVOLI, ESQ. Suite 600

Syracuse, New York 13202-1252

Attorneys for Defendant Menon

MURPHY, BURNS, BARBER & MURPHY, LLP THOMAS K. MURPHY, ESQ. 226 Great Oaks Boulevard

Albany, New York 12203

Attorneys for Defendants Scudder, Herkimer County

Correctional Facility, McGrail, Urtz, and Farber

SCULLIN, Senior Judge

ORDER *2

In a Report-Recommendation dated December 15, 2010, Magistrate Judge Baxter recommended that the Court grant Defendants' motions for summary judgment and dismiss the amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 96. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, essentially raising the same arguments that he presented to Magistrate Judge Baxter. See Dkt. No. 97.

When a party files specific objections to a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the district court makes a " de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, when a party files "[g]eneral or conclusory objections or objections which merely recite the same arguments [that he presented] to the magistrate judge," the court reviews those recommendations for clear error. O'Diah v. Mawhir , No. 9:08-CV-322, 2011 WL 933846, *1 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2011) (citations and footnote omitted). After the appropriate review, "the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) .

Despite the conclusory nature of most of Plaintiff's objections, the Court has reviewed the record de novo in light of the issues that Plaintiff raised in those objections. Having completed that review, the Court finds his objections to be without merit.

Accordingly, the Court hereby that Magistrate Judge Baxter's December 15, 2010 Report-Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further that Defendant Menon's motion for summary judgment is ; and the Court further

*3 that Defendants Scudder, Herkimer County Correctional Facility, McGrail, Urtz, and Farber's motion for summary judgment is ; and the Court further that Plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED ; and the Court further

ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2011

Syracuse, New York

Case Details

Case Name: Hanrahan v. Mennon
Court Name: District Court, N.D. New York
Date Published: Mar 31, 2011
Docket Number: 9:07-cv-00610
Court Abbreviation: N.D.N.Y.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.