midpage

HANRAHAN Et Al. v. HAMPTON Et Al.HANRAHAN Et Al. v. HAMPTON Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 30, 1980
79-912
Versions:446 U.S. 1301
100 S. Ct. 1868
64 L. Ed. 2d 214
1980 U.S. LEXIS 2309
Mr. Justice Rehnquist.

Plaintiffs-respondents and their counsel in these cases have moved that I “be recused from the proceedings in this case” for the reasons stated in their 14-page motion and their five Appendices filed with the Clerk of this Court on April 3, 1980. The motion is opposed by the state-defendant petitioners in the action. Since generally the Court as an institution leaves such motions, even though they be addressed to it, to the decision of the individual Justices to whom they refer, see Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Mine Workers, 325 U. S. 897 (1945) (denial of petition for rehearing) (Jackson, J., concurring), I shall treat the motion as addressed to me individually. I have considered the motion, the Appendices, the response of the state defendants, 28 U. S. C. § 455 (1976 ed. and Supp. Ill), and the current American Bar Association Code of Judicial Conduct, and the motion is accordingly

Denied.

Case Details

Case Name: HANRAHAN Et Al. v. HAMPTON Et Al.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 30, 1980
Citations: 446 U.S. 1301; 100 S. Ct. 1868; 64 L. Ed. 2d 214; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2309; 79-912
Docket Number: 79-912
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In