HANRAHAN Et Al. v. HAMPTON Et Al.HANRAHAN Et Al. v. HAMPTON Et Al.
Plaintiffs-respondents and their counsel in these cases have moved that I “be recused from the proceedings in this case” for the reasons stated in their 14-page motion and their five Appendices filed with the Clerk of this Court on April 3, 1980. The motion is opposed by the state-defendant petitioners in the action. Since generally the Court as an institution leaves such motions, even though they be addressed to it, to the decision of the individual Justices to whom they refer, see
Jewell Ridge Coal Corp.
v.
Mine Workers,
Denied.