History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hannah v. State
27 Tex. Ct. App. 623
| Tex. App. | 1889
|
Check Treatment
White, Presiding Judge.

In this case the Assistant Attorney General frankly confesses that he can not ask an affirmance of the judgment. The evidence is wholly insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment, and even if the evidence .was sufficient the judgment would have to be reversed on account of errors in the charge of the court, both in regard to the instructions as to circumstantial evidence and recent possession.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Hannah v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 15, 1889
Citation: 27 Tex. Ct. App. 623
Docket Number: No. 6458
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.