170 Ga. 369 | Ga. | 1930
The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial. The suit was to subject property, legal title to which was in the wife’s name, but which was alleged to have been conveyed to her without consideration paid by her, by procurement and direction of the husband, for the purpose of hindering and delaying the petitioner, a creditor of the husband. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff. The defendant moved for a new trial on the general grounds, and amended by adding five other grounds. One of the latter grounds was expressly abandoned, and one is not mentioned in the brief of the plaintiff in error. One ground of the motion complains of the admis
The evidence supports the verdict. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial show error. Judgment.affirmed.