History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hanemann v. State
228 So. 2d 382
Fla.
1969
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See State v. Lowe, 130 So. 2d 288 (Fla.App.1961).

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.





Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent. I am in complete agreement with the views expressed and the judgment reached by Judge Rawls in his dissenting opinion in the district court, appearing at 221 So.2d 230.

Case Details

Case Name: Hanemann v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Nov 25, 1969
Citation: 228 So. 2d 382
Docket Number: No. 38677
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In