Case Information
*1 Case 2:25-cv-00080 Document 27 Filed on 06/24/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED June 24, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
ANTHONY HANCOCK, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§ VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00080
§
JOHN DOE 1, et al. , §
§
Defendants. §
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS
On May 20, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss” (D.E. 24). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002- 13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc. , 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n , 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 24), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the 1 / 2
Case 2:25-cv-00080 Document 27 Filed on 06/24/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2 findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court further ORDERS that this dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and INSTRUCTS the Clerk of Court to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov.
ORDERED on June 24, 2025.
_______________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 / 2
