midpage

Hampton v. StateHampton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Nov 9, 1977
No. 76-924
Versions:351 So. 2d 1101
1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16738

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Heath, 343 So.2d 13 (Fla.1977).

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion.





Concurrence Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge,

concurring specially:

This appeal involves the question presented in Pace v. State, 350 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA, Opinion filed June 24, 1977), in which I dissented. See also dissent upon denial of rehearing, Opinion filed October 11, 1977. The rule is now established that the trial court may impose the restriction discussed in Pace, supra. Therefore, I concur in the result here but do not recede from my opinion in that dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Hampton v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 9, 1977
Citations: 351 So. 2d 1101; 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16738; No. 76-924
Docket Number: No. 76-924
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In