52 So. 659 | Ala. | 1910
The appellant, a boy 12 years of age, was indicted and convicted of the crime of burglary.
In this there was no error. While section 6450, as it stood at that time, applied to all juvenile delinquents, yet on the 25th day of August, 1909, said section was amended so as to apply only to children under 14 years of age, charged with the commission of a misdemeanor or violation of a city ordinance. — Acts Sp. Sess. 1909, p. 117.
As the juvenile delinquent act at the time of the trial did not apply to the crime of burglary, there was no error in the action of the court. — Ex parte Perryman, 156 Ala. 625, 46 South. 866.
During the trial a witness made statements of a confession made by the defendant, which defendant’s counsel moved the court to exclude, which motion the court overruled.
Section 6464 of the Code provides that: “The statements, declarations, confessions, or admissions of any kind, made by a child under fourteen years of age, to any person, officer of the court; or the manner or demeanor or silence of such child, when questioned or accused, or any statement made by any person, officer- or the court, shall never be legal or competent evidence against the child in any court proceedings whatever, nor shall the same he admitted by any court in any proceeding against the child.”
This section is general and applies to statements, etc., by any child under 14, and it shows that it refers to “any court or proceedings.”
There is no reason why a child should not be allowed to inculpate himself as to a misdemeanor, and yet be permitted, by his statements, to fix upon himself a graver crime, a felony.
The judgment of the court is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.