History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hammitt v. Bullett's Executors
1 Call 567
Va. Ct. App.
1799
Check Treatment
PENDLETON, President.

Delivered the resolution of the Court to the following effect:

*495The plaintiff’s counsel seems to have thought, that as there was no penalty to cover the interest, it could not be recovered under the act of Assembly, although the interest was promised; but, could only be given in damages; and so declares for the debt, and lays his damages for nonpayment. Whether he was mistaken or not, is doubtful; though the practice is, to claim and recover the interest with the principal. Yet, since the defendant is not injured, but benefitted by the alteration, he has no right to complain of it as an error, if it be one.*

Conditions performed, to a specialty for payment of money, amounts to the general issue of payment.

/Supersedeas denied.

[* Smith v. Harmanson, 1 Wash. 6 ; Pendleton v. Vandevier, Ib, 381.]

Case Details

Case Name: Hammitt v. Bullett's Executors
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Apr 17, 1799
Citation: 1 Call 567
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.