12729 | Ga. Ct. App. | Nov 17, 1921

Luke, J.

There is no merit in the errors assigned upon the several excerpts from the charge of the court. If the defendant wished more particular instructions, timely request should have been made. The evidence authorized the conviction, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Harris & Harris, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Taylor, solicitor-general, J. F. Kelly, contra.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.