History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hammett v. State
27 Ga. App. 624
Ga. Ct. App.
1921
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

There is no merit in the errors assigned upon the several excerpts from the charge of the court. If the defendant wished more particular instructions, timely request should have been made. The evidence authorized the conviction, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Harris & Harris, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Taylor, solicitor-general, J. F. Kelly, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Hammett v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 17, 1921
Citation: 27 Ga. App. 624
Docket Number: 12729
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.