History
  • No items yet
midpage
128 A. 247
N.J.
1925
Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, McGlennon, Kats, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Hammel v. Van Sickle
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 16, 1925
Citations: 128 A. 247; 101 N.J.L. 402; 1925 N.J. LEXIS 246
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Hammel v. Van Sickle, 128 A. 247