midpage

Hamilton v. StateHamilton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 2, 1984
No. AX-87
Versions:449 So. 2d 395
1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13141
PER CURIAM.

This Court has previously affirmed appellant’s conviction of burglary of a dwelling and fifteen year sentence. Hamilton v. State, 434 So.2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). His motion for post-conviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, improperly raised two issues that the trial court correctly denied as they should have been raised on direct appeal and may not now be considered. Christopher v. State, 416 So.2d 450 (Fla.1982).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hamilton v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 2, 1984
Citations: 449 So. 2d 395; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13141; No. AX-87
Docket Number: No. AX-87
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In