History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hamilton v. Secretary of State
172 N.W. 619
Mich.
1919
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that the petition filed with the secretary of State and considered in Hamilton v. Secretary of State, 204 Mich. 439, cannot be treated as a continuing petition, to be revived as such from time to time by the addition of other names. It was filed to effect a purpose. It was found and declared to be insufficient for the purpose because lacking signatures. It performed its office and as a petition, in view of the law, is dead.

Case Details

Case Name: Hamilton v. Secretary of State
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 10, 1919
Citation: 172 N.W. 619
Docket Number: Calendar No. 28,840½
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In