History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hamilton v. Russell
1 Cranch 97
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1802
Check Treatment

But

THE COURT

were unanimously of opinion that the possession, or the probability that his brother would suffer him to remain in possession, was not such an interest as affected his competency, but went only to his credibility. (See the other points of this case in the report of it in the supreme court of the United States, 1 Cranch [5 U. S.l 309, where the judgment of this court was affirmed.)

[The question of the competency of the witness does not seem to have been raised in the supreme court.]

Case Details

Case Name: Hamilton v. Russell
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Nov 15, 1802
Citation: 1 Cranch 97
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.