History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hamilton v. Moore
1797 U.S. LEXIS 207
| SCOTUS | 1797
|
Check Treatment
3 U.S. 371 (____)
3 Dall. 371

HAMILTON
versus
MOORE.

Supreme Court of United States.

*374 Ingersoll and Dallas, for the Defendant in error.

*377 But, THE COURT observed, that there was no error in point of fact; nor any clerical error to amend. The writ bears the date when it was actually sued out and lodged in the office: there is, therefore, nothing on the record, by which it can be amended; and the objection is fatal.

The Writ of Error was, therefore, non-prossed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hamilton v. Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Aug 15, 1797
Citation: 1797 U.S. LEXIS 207
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.