205 P. 205 | Mont. | 1922
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover from defendant, as his tenant, rent alleged to be due on a garage building in Great .Falls. The action was tried before the court sitting with
A written term lease covering the premises had been pre
The only question involved in this appeal is whether "or not the evidence is sufficient to support the findings of the jury.
From the foregoing evidence it appears that defendant had made complete arrangements for the vacation of the entire building by August 15, but that at the request of plaintiff he asked the subtenants mentioned to remain after that date. While it does appear that these subtenants did not enter into any arrangements directly with plaintiff for their several occupancies of the premises, nevertheless it is clear that under
The judgment and order overruling' the motion for new trial are affirmed.
Affirmed.