midpage

Hamersly v. BrownHamersly v. Brown

New York Court of Chancery
Apr 9, 1817
Reporters:
, ,
The Chancellor

[ * 429 ]

denied the ‍​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‍motion, for want of notice to the plaintiff’s solicitor. Such ‍​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‍a rule, after publication *has already passed, is not to ‍​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‍be granted without due notice to the opposite party; for ‍​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‍it is not a rule of course, and must be ‍​​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‍founded on special circumstances.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Hamersly v. Brown
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Apr 9, 1817
Citations: 2 Johns. Ch. 428; 1817 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 11; 1817 N.Y. LEXIS 208
Log In