History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ham v. Taylor
22 Tex. 225
Tex.
1858
Check Treatment
Wheeler, Ch. J.

There was manifestly no error in overruling the motion for a new trial. There can he no just pretense that the damages were excessive. 1STor will a new trial he granted, on the ground of newly discovered evidence, which, .at most, could he received only in mitigation of damages. Judgment affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ham v. Taylor
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 22 Tex. 225
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.