History
  • No items yet
midpage
Halsted v. Halsted
23 N.Y.S. 191
The Superior Court of the City...
1893
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the' decision that was made. It was uncertain that the letters "contained anything that would benefit the defendants, if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Halsted v. Halsted
Court Name: The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
Date Published: May 1, 1893
Citation: 23 N.Y.S. 191
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.