History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hallman v. State
845 So. 2d 265
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2003
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Haying reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. Cozart v. State, 823 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J., and BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hallman v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 9, 2003
Citation: 845 So. 2d 265
Docket Number: No. 1D02-2694
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.