History
  • No items yet
midpage
Halliday v. Cienkowski
3 A.2d 372
Pa.
1938
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the refusal to take off a judgment of nonsuit in an action of trespass for slanderous words. To the opinion of the court below * may he added the following cases, representative of the supporting decisions in other jurisdictions: De Santo v. De Nicola, 99 Conn. 717, 122 A. 708, and Warren v. Ray, 155 Mich. 91, *124 118 N. W. 741, both holding that such words are not libelous per se in the absence of special circumstances showing that the words were not used in their ordinary-meaning; and Terwilliger v. Wands, 17 N. Y. 54, holding that mental distress and consequent physical illness do not constitute special damages recoverable where the words used are not actionable per se.

Judgment affirmed.

Notes

*

Halliday v. Cienkowslei, 32 D. & C. 410.

Case Details

Case Name: Halliday v. Cienkowski
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 6, 1938
Citation: 3 A.2d 372
Docket Number: Appeal, 244
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.