Hallett v. Slidell
11 Johns. 56
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1814
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

According to Long v. Jackson, (2 Wils. 8.) the plaintiffs were authorized to introduce into their replication matter in explanation of, or to fortify, their declaration, without incurring the charge of a departure; and as they introduced new matter, to wit, the course and practice of the court as to appearance, the conclusion with a verification was proper, and the judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed'.