History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hallam v. Grant
280 U.S. 522
SCOTUS
1929
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further' herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no substantial federal question upon which a writ of certiorari can be issued. The petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore also denied. *523The costs already incurred herein shall be paid by the Clerk as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Mr. William H. Hallam, pro se, for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.

Case Details

Case Name: Hallam v. Grant
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 25, 1929
Citation: 280 U.S. 522
Docket Number: No. 472
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.