Hall v. StateHall v. State
Billy Jack Hall was indicted and convicted of first-degree murder and robbery with a deadly weapon. Hall does not challenge the murder conviction, but appeals the trial court’s rulings permitting the State to introduce a ring into evidence at trial and denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the robbery charge. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Hall’s motion to suppress the ring; however, we reverse the conviction for robbery with a deadly weapon and direct the trial court to impose a judgment and sentence for robbery with a weapon.
First, Hall argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress a ring the police obtained during an illegal interrogation, which the police conducted after Hall was arrested, but before he was booked into the jail. The State concedes that the police obtained the ring in violation of Hall’s Fourth Amendment rights, but argues that the ring is nonetheless admissible under the “inevitable discovery” doctrine. We agree.
Illegally obtained evidence may be admissible if the State shows that the evidence “ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered by lawful means.” Craig v. State,
inevitably would have discovered the ring upon review of Hall’s personal effects.
As to Hall’s second issue, we agree that the State failed to establish that Hall used a deadly weapon during the course of the robbery. However, the State did establish that Hall committed the robbery with a weapon by showing that Hall used a knife to bind the victim during the robbery. See § 812.13(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997). See also Miller v. State,
Affirmed in part; reversed in part with directions to impose a judgment and sentence for robbery with a weapon.