History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hall v. State
32 Ga. App. 542
Ga. Ct. App.
1924
Check Treatment
Bloodwoktii, J.

1. There is no merit in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial. Although the defendant made no statement, the judge charged the jury as if he had made one, but he quickly discovered his error and promptly withdrew that portion of the charge from the jury, stating to them that it had been inadvertently given.

2. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J.,, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hall v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 8, 1924
Citation: 32 Ga. App. 542
Docket Number: 15696
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.