History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hall v. State
17 Ga. App. 805
Ga. Ct. App.
1916
Check Treatment
Wade, J.

1. It is immaterial whether, in overruling the ground of the motion for a new trial relating to alleged newly discovered evidence, the trial judge based his ruling upon his estimate as to the credibility and value of that evidence in the light of a counter-showing by the State, since the evidence was merely impeaching in character, and it is a well-settled rule that newly discovered evidence tending merely to impeach a witness for the State is not a sufficient cause for the grant of a new trial.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, O. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Hall v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 17, 1916
Citation: 17 Ga. App. 805
Docket Number: 7116
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.