History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hall v. State
46 S.W.3d 117
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2001
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Lee Hall appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Hall v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 22, 2001
Citation: 46 S.W.3d 117
Docket Number: No. WD 58843
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.