History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hall v. State
102 Tex. Crim. 329
Tex. Crim. App.
1925
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of McLennan County for unlawfully carrying a pistol, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100.

This court has held that one going in an automobile from one town to a point thirty or thirty-five miles distant was not a traveler as a matter of law. George v. State, 90 Tex. Crim. 179. The trial court submitted to the jury in general terms the question as to whether appellant was a traveler and instructed them if they so found to acquit him, and the jury's verdict was adverse to the proposition. This being a misdemeanor case, and no special charge being asked seeking to have appellant's view of the law presented to the jury, we have always held an exception to the charge as given in a misdemeanor case to be not sufficient. See authorities collated in Vernon's Annotated C. C. P., p. 499.

Appellant having the pistol in the car was sufficient to make same a violation of the law. Mayfield v. State, 75 Tex. Crim. 103. We observe in addition to this that there was testimony before the jury that appellant drew the pistol on a man named Dean.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed. *Page 331

Case Details

Case Name: Hall v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 11, 1925
Citation: 102 Tex. Crim. 329
Docket Number: No. 9467.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.