History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hall v. Logan
34 Pa. 331
Pa.
1859
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thompson, J.

In this case, the legal plaintiff was also one of the defendants. At common law, such a suit could not be sustained. *332No one can, in the same action, be both plaintiff and defendant: 2 Bos. & Pull. 120; 2 Marsh. 319; 6 Taunt. 597 ; s. c. 1 Mast 27; 1 Roll. 176.

In McFadden v. Hunt, 5 W. & S. 472, it was decided, that such an action derives no aid from the 1st section of the Act of 1838. That act provides for suits by one firm against another, where some of the partners are members of both firms. This was decided in Miller v. Knauff, in the District Court of Philadelphia, about the same time: 3 Penn. L. J. 225. We are not disposed to change the construction given to the act, and do not think the special entry of the judgment in the case, takes it. out of the rule.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hall v. Logan
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 1, 1859
Citation: 34 Pa. 331
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.