10 Ky. Op. 296 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1879
delivered the opinion of the court.
The question raised in this case is, can an attachment issue before the summons. We see no escape from the conclusion, reached by the Court below.
The various actions in which attachments had been obtained were consolidated, and the question presented as to the rights of the creditors. Each creditor was directly interested in having the property or its proceeds applied to the payment of his debt; and we perceive no reason why, in such a case, one creditor should not be allowed to contest the right of priority on the part of other creditors, and to show that they have, in fact, no lien on the property sold. The attachment of the appellant was void,
• as no summons had issued.
The judgment below is therefore affirmed.