Halili v. City of New YorkHalili v. City of New York
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff‘s motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. Evidence that the defendant driver, Anthony Saltamacchia, was convicted of leaving the scene of an accident, although reprehensible, was not a proximate cause of the injuries to the plaintiff‘s decedent (see Boykin v Mora, 274 AD2d 441 [2000]; Taylor v Dyer, 190 AD2d 902 [1993]; cf. Rahn v Carkner, 241 AD2d 585 [1997]). Moreover, the defendant Joseph Saltamacchia, the owner of the vehicle, can only be vicariously liable for the collision and thus cannot be liable for punitive damages (see Poulard v Papamihlopoulos, 254 AD2d 266 [1998]).
The plaintiff‘s remaining contentions are without merit.
Schmidt, J.P., Skelos, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.