Hale v. Hammond
102 Ga. 553
Ga.
1897
Check Treatment
Fish, J.

This case involves no new legal question; the charges complained of were correct presentations of the law applicable to the issues involved; there was no error at the trial; the evidence, though in many respects conflicting, fully warranted the verdict rendered, and there was no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.