History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hair v. State
503 So. 2d 449
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, appellant contends we should grant relief because the trial court, based solely on a finding that appellant violated his probation, bumped his recommended guidelines sentence up more than one cell. His failure to seek appellate review of such an error precluded the trial court from consideration of the issue. Affirmed. Rowe v. State, 496 So.2d 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hair v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 4, 1987
Citation: 503 So. 2d 449
Docket Number: No. 86-3252
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.