Hair v. State, 120 S.E. 35

Hair v. State

120 S.E. 35

Ga. Ct. App.

1923

Check Treatment

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon. His motion for a new trial, which was based upon the general grounds only, was overruled. The evidence was in conflict, but the jury believed, as they had a right to do, the evidence of the State, which authorized the defendant’s conviction. The trial judge approved the verdict. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.