Hainzer Unemployment Compensation Case
202 Pa. Super. 172 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1963
Opinion by
In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and the board all concluded that thé ap
Claimant quit her full-time employment because her baby sitter left and she had no one to care for her five-year old child. This case is ruled by Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case, 197 Pa. Superior Ct. 427, 178 A. 2d 775; and Domico Unemployment Compensation Case, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 327, 181 A. 2d 731.
Decision affirmed.