History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haines v. Stare
249 Pa. 494
Pa.
1915
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The bill of the complainant was for the reformation of a deed. His incompetency as a witness to matters occurring in the lifetime of Sophia Stare, a deceased grantee, is the subject of the first assignment of error. It is not necessary for us to pass upon the question of his competency, for an admission of counsel for appellants in their history of the case is that his testimony was eliminated by the learned chancellor in making the decree. It is affirmed on the facts found and the conclusions reached by the trial judge.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Haines v. Stare
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 17, 1915
Citation: 249 Pa. 494
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 183
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.