History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haines v. Dearborn
199 Pa. 474
Pa.
1901
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

We have examined and considered with care the report of the learned referee, together with the testimony and correspondence on which it is founded, and our conclusion is that no error appears in it which would authorize a modification or reversal of it in favor of the defendants. The exceptions filed to the report by the defendants were duly considered, passed upon, and finally dismissed by the court. As we are satisfied that a just conclusion was reached by the learned referee and approved by the court, we unhesitatingly affirm the judgment appealed from. We therefore dismiss all the assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Haines v. Dearborn
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 27, 1901
Citation: 199 Pa. 474
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 52
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.