History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hahne v. Meyer
173 Pa. 151
Pa.
1896
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

In this case stated judgment was rightly entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for $1,500. There is nothing in either of the assignments of error that requires special notice. Neither of them is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hahne v. Meyer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 6, 1896
Citation: 173 Pa. 151
Docket Number: Appeal No. 247
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.