History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haga v. Holcombe
147 Ga. App. 520
Ga. Ct. App.
1978
Check Treatment
Bell, Chief Judge.

In this property damage suit, defendant’s motion for directed verdict was denied. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and judgment was entered. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and it was granted. On appeal the plaintiffs only enumeration of error requires a consideration of the evidence. No transcript of the evidence has been filed nor has the evidence adduced at trial been otherwise submitted under the methods outlined in Code Ann. § 6-805. Accordingly, we must assume that the trial court correctly granted the defendant’s motion. Davis v. Davis, 232 Ga. 851 (209 SE2d 187).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur. Argued September 19, 1978 Decided October 12, 1978. Wininger & Gregory, David R. Wininger, for appellant. Glyndon C. Pruitt, for appellees.

Case Details

Case Name: Haga v. Holcombe
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 12, 1978
Citation: 147 Ga. App. 520
Docket Number: 56464
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.