History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haehnlen v. Commonwealth
13 Pa. 617
Pa.
1850
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The United States vs. Kirkpatrick, is the leading authority for a principle which covers the ease.. While that authority remains unshaken, to show that it was the duty of the accounting 'officers to prevent the defalcation, is to show nothing. That case, and many others in our own hooks, prove beyond, question, that the right of the commonwealth cannot be lost by the laches of its agents. ■ The present offers nothing new, nor any circumstance to take it out of the rule of policy we have invariably enforced. .

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Haehnlen v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 15, 1850
Citation: 13 Pa. 617
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.